CDC Drops a Bombshell on Itself, Exposes Alarming Risk/Benefit Analysis
If there was any doubt about an intent to harm, there is no doubt anymore.
Originally Published on Vigilant News
Recently (Sept 12), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued new recommendations, advising “updated” COVID-19 vaccines for everyone aged six months and older.
This announcement raised alarm bells, as the CDC’s guidance starkly contrasts with other countries like the UK, where Autumn booster vaccinations are recommended for those over 65 years old — a 64.5-year difference.
So, what gives? Why is the CDC recommending new booster shots for babies when other countries are advising them for senior citizens only?
Well, it seems the “experts” at the CDC are unable/unwilling to do basic math.
According to the CDC’s own website, a million vaccine doses would prevent between 19 to 95 hospitalizations, 5 to 19 ICU admissions, and possibly one death for 12 to 17-year-olds.
The recommendation becomes more baffling for 5 to 11-year-olds, where an estimated 16 to 76 hospitalizations would be prevented for every million doses given.
Even for 18 to 49-year-olds, a million doses would only prevent an estimated 75 hospitalizations based on Spring data.
But how many serious adverse events are we causing per million doses?
The numbers are horrifying. Dr. John Campbell took the CDC’s estimations for hospitalizations and ICU visits prevented by the COVID shots, and compared them to the serious adverse event rate per one million doses, based on Dr. Joseph Fraiman and colleagues’ re-analysis of the Pfizer and Moderna clinical trials.
This is what he found:
For every million doses administered, Pfizer’s data revealed an additional 1,000 incidents of serious adverse events of special interest compared to the placebo group.
The situation appears even more concerning with Moderna; their data indicated that every million doses resulted in 1,500 additional serious adverse events of special interest.
So, the CDC is recommending a shot that causes 1,000 serious adverse events or more per million doses to save maybe one life (12-17 age group).
“Now, if that mathematics makes any sense to you, do let me know because I just don’t know where the thinking is coming from here,” remarked Dr. Campbell. “The main point in medicine is about the individual. It’s the balance of risks for the individual. And this data to me indicates that it’s not there.”
The CDC is one of the most prominent health agencies in the world.
How can an agency of such caliber advocate for a vaccine regimen that, in the 12-17 age group, may result in 1,000 serious adverse events or more for the prevention of merely 19 to 95 hospitalizations?
I believe top-level minds don’t make such catastrophic errors consistently, over a three-year period, unless they are incentivized to do so. So, if there was any doubt that there was an intent to harm, there is no doubt anymore.
Want to see more content like this? Subscribe to Vigilant News below to receive updates on the latest and most newsworthy stories.
And while you’re here, check out these ten stories that the corporate media never told you about last month.
#10 - Fauci now admits the COVID vaccines cause myocarditis.
#9 - Ivermectin is even safer than you think.
#8 - RFK Jr. identifies "the real shooter" behind his father's death.
#7 - German study exposes the dangers of masks and CO2 re-breathing.
#6 - Teachers are being decimated by aggressive metastatic cancers after vaccine mandates.
#5 - Unvaccinated children are healthier, according to studies they don't want you to see.
#4 - Recent wave of forest fires is not due to climate change but something much more sinister.
#3 - Excess mortality just got even worse — but don't look at the vaccine.
#2 - First-ever published spike detox protocol details how you can get better after the COVID shots.
#1 - Viral RFK Jr. video gets censored by "X" after exposing what Pfizer doesn't want you to know.
"To save our healthcare capacity, we must injure far more people than the virus will!"
Top-level clown world thinking, there.
Is it worth pointing out all the recent data and studies that prove the vaccines actually INCREASE the risks of infection, hospitalisation and death.
Don’t get me wrong... this is a good, concise article. But it always annoys me when we use the bullshit numbers put out by the authorities... even if they still look bad. The reality is much worse than this... because the truth is that the mRNA shots are NEGATIVELY effective, and then we all of the side effects. It’s all negatives... no positives, no matter the age group.