Vigilant News

Share this post

Vigilant News
Vigilant News
Dr. Paul Marik Exposes the Truth About Chemotherapy
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Dr. Paul Marik Exposes the Truth About Chemotherapy

You won‘t hear this from your typical oncologist.

The Vigilant Fox
Jun 24, 2024
472

Share this post

Vigilant News
Vigilant News
Dr. Paul Marik Exposes the Truth About Chemotherapy
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
132
82

Dr. Paul Marik, a renowned critical care physician, has shed light on the harsh realities of chemotherapy’s ineffectiveness in treating cancer. He revealed that only “about 5% of all cancers are actually curable with chemotherapy.”

This small fraction of cancers that are chemo-responsive includes testicular cancer, Hodgkin's lymphoma, acute lymphatic leukemia, and a short list of others. (See image below)

But for the remaining 95% of cancer cases, the prognosis is far less optimistic. Dr. Marik stated, “Chemotherapy is palliative at best,” highlighting that while chemotherapy might prolong survival by one or two months, it comes with a significant cost to the patient’s quality of life. The treatment often leads to several severe side effects, including:

  • Nausea and vomiting

  • Hair loss

  • Anemia

  • Bruising and bleeding

  • Skin and nail changes

  • Cognitive changes

  • Sexual and reproductive issues

  • Peripheral neuropathy

  • Edema

  • “Knocks out the bone marrow,” making patients immune-compromised and at risk of infection

The truly sobering detail that Dr. Marik mentioned was that despite advancements in chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgical treatments over the past 30 years, the overall life expectancy of a cancer patient has been extended by a measly 3.9 months.

Join 67K+ Substack followers and 960K+ 𝕏 users who follow the work of Vigilant Fox. Subscribe to Vigilant News today to get the scoop on stories you won’t see anywhere else.

This statistic raises a critical question: With the high costs and severe side effects that accompany conventional cancer therapies, is it truly worth it?

Dr. Marik urges cancer patients to ask their oncologists a vital question: “Is this [chemotherapy] going to cure my cancer, or is it just going to palliate and extend my life a month or two with terrible side effects?”

“Hopefully, they’ll be honest,” he added.

Click here to watch the full interview.

Share

Related Stories:

Reduce Your Cancer Risk by 60%: 10 Things You Can Do

Cancer Surgeon Drops Ivermectin Bombshell

472

Share this post

Vigilant News
Vigilant News
Dr. Paul Marik Exposes the Truth About Chemotherapy
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
132
82
Share

Discussion about this post

Kathleen Janoski
Jun 24

A friend of mine who was being treated for cancer was told by his cancer doctor to take the covid DeathVax.

He now has 2 more different cancers.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
26 replies
SEF
Jun 24Edited

Dr. Marik, as usual, is providing extraordinarily valuable information. The question I have is: for the (majority of) cancer types that chemotherapy is not curative against, DOES IT EVEN "extend life a month or two" as stated? Or does it even perhaps SHORTEN life in a significant fraction of cases, by predisposing the patient to life-threatening risks such as organ failure, or severe immunosuppression that could make even a mild infection deadly and could enable the remaining cancer cells to thrive and/or promote the formation of second cancers due to diminished immunosurvelliance, for example? Or simply cause horrible quality of life (not due to the cancer itself) which makes the patient more likely to "give up" sooner and agree to hospice and passive euthanasia, therefore dying sooner? I have heard multiple doctors mention these issues and I believe Dr. Marik even might have mentioned some of them himself a while back, if I remember correctly?

What I am very interested in is seeing randomized controlled clinical trials (preferably double-blinded) which show that chemotherapy either does or does not improve OVERALL SURVIVAL (even by a month or two etc.) in "incurable" cancers, compared to no chemotherapy. And if survival is indeed improved with chemotherapy in certain clinical trials of "incurable" cancers, what were the doses/regimens used in those trials, and were they much less harsh than the typical doses/regimens used in everyday patients outside of clinical trials?

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
8 replies
130 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2025 The Vigilant Fox
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More