Dr. Marik, as usual, is providing extraordinarily valuable information. The question I have is: for the (majority of) cancer types that chemotherapy is not curative against, DOES IT EVEN "extend life a month or two" as stated? Or does it even perhaps SHORTEN life in a significant fraction of cases, by predisposing the patient to life-threatening risks such as organ failure, or severe immunosuppression that could make even a mild infection deadly and could enable the remaining cancer cells to thrive and/or promote the formation of second cancers due to diminished immunosurvelliance, for example? Or simply cause horrible quality of life (not due to the cancer itself) which makes the patient more likely to "give up" sooner and agree to hospice and passive euthanasia, therefore dying sooner? I have heard multiple doctors mention these issues and I believe Dr. Marik even might have mentioned some of them himself a while back, if I remember correctly?
What I am very interested in is seeing randomized controlled clinical trials (preferably double-blinded) which show that chemotherapy either does or does not improve OVERALL SURVIVAL (even by a month or two etc.) in "incurable" cancers, compared to no chemotherapy. And if survival is indeed improved with chemotherapy in certain clinical trials of "incurable" cancers, what were the doses/regimens used in those trials, and were they much less harsh than the typical doses/regimens used in everyday patients outside of clinical trials?
My son in law is cancer free from metastatic testicular cancer for ten years. His chemotherapy nearly killed him. My mother at 79 was given 2 years to live with ovarian cancer she had chemotherapy and alternative therapies and lived for 9 years and died of heart failure.
Another question is did the patient actually have the cancer or was it a misdiagnosis to get them on the money making merry go round? My mother was told she had stomach cancer and so we got access to her notes to get a second opinion and it turned out the first doctor had "misread" her test results that stated there in black and white "Non-Malignant" but he had told her she needed him to do an operation quickly and she might live another 6 months. It turned out all she had wrong was an ulcer caused by helicobacter pylori that was cured with a cheap course of drugs over a couple of weeks. She lived for another 2 years but we are sure the shock of him telling her she had cancer when she clearly didn't shortened her life considerably.
There was a huge scandal in the British NHS a few years back where cancer tests were constantly gotten wrong on an enormous scale and the suspicion in my mind is they have simply gotten better at covering up their incompetence rather than solving the issue.
I was diagnosed with cancer in early 2020. What is clear is that the diagnosis was based on one lab report which I managed eventually to get a copy of, but not until I had 9 sessions of immunotherapy. I stopped because I worked out what was really wrong which I mention elsewhere in the comments.
Not only incompetent but hamstrung by fears of racism. When my sister, a nurse of around 40 years standing, asked my mother's doctor why on earth he hadn't even treated my mother for the stomach bug causing the ulcer that was also in the report he received he basically said that he didn't want to tread on the consultant oncologist's toes because he was a Pakistani and so he might be accused of racism. However it was my mother's doctor who said he thought we should get a second opinion as he clearly knew she didn't have cancer but was too afraid to speak out. So we had to treat my mother ourselves and when we paid for a second set of tests with another consultant privately, we demanded a Scottish one so my mother would hopefully believe him and not the original incompetent Pakistani consultant but even after the Scottish consultant told her that she did not have cancer and that the stomach bug had been causing the issues she still believed there was no smoke without fire and that she had cancer. She was early 80's at that time and once she got a thing in her head it stayed unfortunately. The NHS is rotten to the core and those within it are too loving of their fat salaries and pensions to speak out.
True, but as far as the mRNA vaccines, the RCTs done by Pfizer and Moderna DID reveal a net effect of "4 killed for every 3 saved" even under prime conditions. They weren't able to hide that (perhaps the truth is worse), but that's a start for sure.
Yes, the thing is the 3 saved is a ridiculous statement in any event as they are trying to prove a negative. It is rather like the 20 million saved nonsense we have heard. The truth is worse, far worse.
In fact, stopping chemotherapy might give you an additional six months of high-quality life. This is just one benefit of avoiding overtreatment. With the right treatments, cancer patients don't need to resort to euthanasia.
I don't like double-blind experiments; a new drug might be compared to a medication that shortens survival time.
You are right. A friend of mine has cancer and I passed him that or a similar link a few months back but he said he would prefer to leave the treatment to his doctors, i.e. the ones that had pushed him to get the DeathVax.
Absolutely!!! A close family member did choose the “expert doc” chemo/radiation path. BUT his wife kicked in w/ Dr. Marik & his Cancer Care book & expertise. Together they changed their diets (no cancer fueled foods, only cancer fighting foods). Plus Ivermectin.
Today cancer free. Healthier than ever. He lost needed weight & put away his CPAP. & most prescriptions (down to 1 statin from 2) no longer needed thanks to healthy weight loss. Says he feels better than has in 20 years! More energy.
Just cleared by colonoscopy (done by a new GI doc). Biopsy of former tumor area clear of any cancer as well as pre-cancerous cells.
He was previously told by oncologist plus previous GI doc he should follow the “standard protocol” of surgery on thar same now clear area .. just to make sure all leftover cancer cells are removed.
It's very sad to watch a patient get a DX of cancer and the emotions and IMMEDIATELY the Oncologist (well even before appt) has all the chemo and appts set up and inundate them with information when they are in no way ready to accept anything.
Not surprising, but so sad. The good news is I believe we’re going to a better place when we leave this earth plane so please be sure your friend sees this amazing uplifting story:
A friend of mine took the Rat Juice and ended up with turbo cancer... prior to starting chemo he was given another shot ... (seems that is standard procedure)... heart attack.
Still is not connecting the cancer or heart attack to the shots even though he is extremely healthy and the doctors found no blockages or other heart disease...
I am one of 7 women in my family diagnosed with breast cancer over the past 20 years. My mother passed away within less than a year of her diagnosis in September 2003. She opted to allow the cancer to run its course. My sister who was diagnosed in the same month as my mother remains disabled to this day, 20 years later as a result of her chemo/radiation therapy.
Nine years later, in November 2012, my younger sister and I were diagnosed in the same month. We found out after she passed that her employer coerced her into doing the conventional therapy by withholding disability income if she didn't do chemo/radiation. Meanwhile, after doing extensive research, I chose alternative therapies because I didn't want to become disabled like my older sister. Then, 2 years later, my younger sister and I were both diagnosed again with the same coercion imposed on my younger sister. She passed less than a year later while I am healthy, strong and rarely ill.
Today, I still feel a sense of intense rage at the cancer industry and the people who insist that there is only one path to healing. My younger sister, I believe, would still be here had she done the same therapy as I did. Our diagnosis was the same and she was even healthier than I was at the time.
I share my story because I believe my sister's death should mean something. I believe that the entire pharma-medical industrial complex is complicit in murder and sharing my story might make people think twice about conventional cancer treatment. I believe that our bodies are incredibly resilient and despite all the toxins in the air food and water we have a miraculous ability to heal - as long as we're not adding to the environmental toxins by injecting carcinogenic substances directly into our bodies in the guise of treating cancer. It never made sense to me that chemo AND radiation, both known carcinogens, could ever do more than weaken the body even IF it kills cancer cells. There are SO MANY other PROVEN healing modalities. I am a living example of this.
So in summary, vaccinations, cancer treatments and many other fraudulent medical interventions are nothing but a form of theft - of our health, our money, our bodily autonomy, our genetic code. Anything we can do to expose these industries and the harms they do, the better. It's like dealing with religious zealots trying to show people evidence, facts and just common sense to state our case. Too many people are dying and suffering needlessly - all for profit. It's diabolical and it must stop.
I'm so sorry to hear how breast cancer has affected so many in your family. I too have a deep anger for the many lies still being pushed today from our mainstream physicians, especially when it comes to treating cancer. I stumbled across this substack a couple years ago and was instantly fascinated. Apparently, there is considerable evidence that many cancers respond very well to Fenbendazole, an animal anti-parasitic drug, and also Ivermectin and Doxycycline. Scroll down to read the many articles and case studies.
Thank you. I am taking FenBen as a therapeutic as well as MMS and ivermectin. Though I do believe that nutrition, sleep, exercise, meditation, alkaline water, detoxing all play an important part in healing. A supportive community is essential. There are many websites but this program comes closest to my healing process. https://www.chrisbeatcancer.com/healing-cancer-with-the-earth-diet/. Another favourite is https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/
This story made me cry with joy, but also grief because this treatment, easily available, could have saved my sister: Miracle Stories - Kate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8cxxoJoNck
Thank you for sharing your story, and very sorry to hear about all that has happened to your sisters and your mother (and you as well, but happy to hear you're "healthy, strong and rarely ill" and hope you stay that way!). The experiences of your family seem like a real example of how while chemotherapy MAY work in certain cases but that's not proven (and it's often at tremendous cost but admittedly better than dying, though there are usually viable alternatives), it almost definitely shortens life and ultimately causes death in other cases (which are probably MORE common), so the risk-benefit assessment very likely leans negative for the vast majority of patients.
Thanks for sharing your story. I’m so sorry for your losses from breast cancer and admire your courage in pushing back.
I’m recently diagnosed and am pushing back. Haven’t started chemo yet and am applying all the principles in Dr. Marin’s Cancer Care book. What was your alternative treatment- if I may ask?
Let me be clear, I am very confident that today, breast cancer can be cured. The following information might be useful to you:
Xuewu Liu
Xuewu Liu’s Substack
Jun 30
Liked by Robert Yoho MD (ret)
Today, we received news of the world's first case of intratumoral injection of chlorine dioxide for breast cancer treatment. On May 5th, a British breast cancer patient, under my guidance, underwent an intratumoral injection for her breast cancer. At that time, she described her tumor as being 7x6 cm in size, with two lymph node metastases. I recommended injecting high-concentration chlorine dioxide (above 3000 ppm) at 10% of the tumor volume. She reported injecting 6 ml into the primary tumor and 1 ml into the metastatic sites, but due to unbearable pain, she couldn't reach the suggested amount.
By early June, she noted that the tumor had softened and reduced in size. Today, she informed me that the tumor now measures 5x4 cm. I estimate that the tumor has shrunk by about 70%. Any clinician with experience in clinical trials would find this reduction ratio astonishing.
However, the patient also conveyed some disappointing news. She believes that the intratumoral chlorine dioxide injection on May 5th had no effect. According to her, the tumor reduction was due to her oral and enema use of MMS since February. To illustrate that my intratumoral injection therapy was ineffective, she claimed that the tumor size was 7x6 cm in February and has been shrinking ever since.
Reporting this case today, I want to emphasize that regardless of the method (MMS or intratumoral chlorine dioxide injection), this case demonstrates that using chlorine dioxide resulted in a 70% reduction in a breast cancer tumor within two months (which I can confirm). This is a remarkable outcome.
Well, they won’t be honest…my sister has just recently been to MDAnderson in Houston and they are pushing the chemo before surgery to “see if it shrinks the tumor so they will know if it is working or not”. If surgery before, and tumor gone, well they will never know…so if it doesn’t work before, her quality of life is horrible while they are “testing it out”, guinea pigs we all are, and they are making millions distributing these drugs. Ever watched the series on Netflix The Resident?????? Says it right out loud 💰💰💰
Decades upon decades of research, and how many BILLIONS spent, and this is all they’ve been able to do? I don’t think so. Do they really want to “cure” cancer? I don’t think so. I’ll be going the alternative medicine route if I get cancer. Lots of info being made available these days for alternative treatments. Ask Joe Tippons!
Understand that the chemotherapy industry has created huge revenues for Big Pharma, doctors and hospitals. There have been alternative treatments as far back as the 1930's that have been snuffed out by the FDA and the Big Pharma model. The most successful have been the use of frequencies to break up tumors and kill cancer cells, leaving healthy cells to thrive. Case in point was the frequency machine developed by Royal Raymond Rife in the late 20's and early 30's. Goggle will tell you he was a fraud, but then google is funded by those that would suffer most if this treatment became available today. However, it is my opinion that new technologies are just around the corner and we will look back in as little as 5 years and describe the current cancer protocol as barbaric. There are other treatments that are also available such as immune stimulants, detoxing, the use of B17, diet, and antihelminthic agents that kill parasites.
After looking (on three occasions over the years in the hopes of making modern high quality reproductions) at the technology Rife had available and the records of his apparatus I am convinced that he was providing UVB treatment to his patients with the radiating tube connected to his machine. There is at least one video on YT of researchers making a modern resonator on the principles Rife described and it is kind of trivial these days but still impossible to determine what his guide numbers relate to and no one has replicated his findings.
All you need is a sine wave and a square wave frequency generator (SDR units are suitable), a wide band mixer, a high power class-A RF amplifier with matching unit and an evacuated discharge tube similar to old x-ray tubes. All you get in the end is UV light that creates Vitamin-D3 in your skin.
I am a firm believer in the value of Vitamin-D3 for supporting our own immune system to fight off almost all the diseases that we meet if we are otherwise well fed and healthy.
For those who are badly deficient in Vitamin-D3 (many in western cultures and high latitudes) even modest doses from UVB, sun, diet or supplemental Vitamin-D3 can have a marked beneficial effect. Even against many (but not all) cancers.
Thanks for your input. I would be curious to hear your evaluation on the Spooky2 device. https://www.spooky2.com/
I believe that there is technology already developed that will mimic and surpass the older Rife technology. You may find Dinshah Ghadiali's work with light frequencies interesting also.
They sell a signal generator for US$100. I am not impressed though that is in essence how a modern day Rife resonator would be implemented because the frequency generation can be done with DSP or other electronics quite trivially to achieve what the original Rife exciter blocks achieved.
The problem is that the generator is a low power transmitter that is supposed to work from low to high frequencies and do magic. I have a HP 33120A waveform generator that can probably do more than a Rife generator could do back in the day and with some software could probably surpass a Spooky2 device except for driving the plasma globe. Yet it is not possible to do anything medically useful with it because there are no tested frequencies that do anything.
On the link you sent me there is an extract (below) from a document they offer in exchange for an email (I will not take yup that offer) and the content looks like what I first saw photocopied 20 years ago, a dogs breakfast with the people creating these document having no idea what they are doing or how these numbers were created. Rire had two arbitrary scales for his two oscillators and the modulation product of the sine wave 'carrier' frequency and the square wave 'comb' signal and with the quality of equipment in the day and his total lack of decent test instruments the numbers mean ZIP, NADA, NOTHING and converting them to a single (or in many cases a few) frequencies is essentially fraud because Rife never documented which of the 'comb' harmonic peaks was the valid frequency, partly because he had no way to test and as far as the plasma lamp they were all the same and generated some ultraviolet light if there was a bit of mercury vapour in the lamp.
I would love it is there was some technological way to test or diagnose or even treat people but it mostly eludes us. I hope it will be found but at the moment believe that the placebo or healer effects are responsible for any positive results. My mother had a couple of sessions with a SCIO system and it was kind of revealing but I am not sold on that technology either.
It seems unlikely that Rife was a fraud, much more likely misguided and he did develop interesting though sometime impossible microscope concepts. Some of these concepts may have misled him in his resonator quest. Some of his microscopes were said to have quartz optics that would allow ultraviolet light to pass, this would have killed the organism if he used the plasma lamps to illuminate his bacteriums. The claims that he imaged viruses are not verifiable though he may have thought he did.
What is an interesting data point is the timing.
"German pediatrician Kurt Huldschinsky successfully demonstrated in the winter of 1918–1919 how rickets could be treated with ultraviolet lamps"
Rife made his resonator claims in 1931-1938 and could have been intuitive enough to think that the plasma lamp could heal people and the frequency selection was simply theatre. I hope not, I like to think well of him but it could have been.
I hope you have not spent money on a Rife resonator and rather budget for 100-500ug=4000-20'000IU of Vitamin-D3 daily with generous magnesium supplementation. Price online and in many western countries is as low as US$0.05 per 100ug=4000IU so starting under US$20 per year.
You can see extracts from my selection of published research at the link below.
I think most doctors will lie when asked this question “Will chemo cure or palliate my chances?” … driven by your fear and their own desire to cure, they will respond something like “of course we cannot guarantee results but there have been successes with chemo and this type of cancer and it represents our very best chance to inhibit its growth and increase your lifespan and blah blah blah” … the truth is most patients do not have the mental or emotional fortitude to turn down any treatment in that situation. Only very solid faith in God could empower the individual and doctor to be truthful and sharp in such an emotional environment.
Everything you said is true, but how many of those rare successes were DUE TO the chemo? Only a randomized controlled trial can tell. Not every single patient with "terminal" cancer dies (even though most do), and that is true regardless of whether they receive chemo or refuse chemo.
Oh possibly none but these doctors live in an alternate reality where they are valiantly fighting an enemy with the most powerful tool in their toolbox … they see every success as a result of their deployment of tools. Modern medicine is like that proverb … when all you have is a hammer, everything looos like a nail. They do not recognize the profiting they themselves are gaining by using that bluntest of instruments for every case possible. When I was growing up, we had a large piece of property and my dad bought a back hoe … you would not believe the wide array of problems that can be addressed by digging holes or tipping down small trees or other backhoe jobs. I think of doctors as my dad armed with a backhoe … very heavy handed and not a lot of careful thinking before hand
There is a drug called "Ukrain" that seems to work pretty good. Wikipedia said the American Cancer Society said there was no evidence the drug was effective.
Great find- the pancreatic cancer RCT from 2002 (last link) is quite impressive, and looks likely legit. Do you know if there have been any subsequent clinical studies since 2002? If not, wonder why when those results were that impressive. Edit: In a quick search I did find this non-clinical (cell line) study from 2021, which is definitely a good sign that there's ongoing interest, but more clinical studies would really be useful.
"Inositol hexaphosphate (IP6) also called phytic acid is a polyphosphorylated carbohydrate naturally found in cereals, nuts, grains, and high-fiber-containing foods. It has been shown to inhibit the growth of many different tumor cell lines both in vitro and in vivo like colon, PANCREAS, liver, prostate, and even melanoma."
"We present a case report of a patient with metastatic melanoma who declined traditional therapy and opted to try over the counter supplement IP6+inositol instead. To our surprise, the patient achieved a complete remission and remains in remission 3 years later."
A few years ago now someone did a poll of a few thousand oncologists asking them if they would have chemotherapy if they got cancer and around 70% said no they wouldn't which then begs the question why then would they do to someone else what they would never have done to themselves? $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Oncologists worldwide follow the NCCN guidelines from the United States to treat their patients. This standardized approach makes ordinary doctors act like veterinarians, indifferent to the effects of guideline therapies like chemotherapy on patients, especially the long-term side effects. Imagine, which doctor cares about their patient's well-being a year later? In cancer treatment, many methods like chemotherapy are prevalent, even though they are almost ineffective. Suffering patients bear the pain alone, while the doctors treating them earn high incomes without contributing any creativity.
Poisoning someone to get them to a state of health makes zero sense. I watched someone I care about suffer greatly during a course of aggressive chemotherapy treatment that ended up killing them within about two weeks after the aggressive therapy had started. They dealt with horrible sores in their mouth and zero immune system when they died. Because of a suggestion from a doctor in a well-known cancer center that they had been waiting for an appointment for. They were stable until that point, getting ready for Christmas and functioning well.
A report on the effectiveness of chemo / radiotherapy by the 3 largest hospital in western Sydney concluded that the success rate was 3%... gobsmacked. I have the report on a hard drive somewhere.
I guess there are many stories out there and many different experiences. I was rather shocked that my brother-in-law was diagnosed with colon cancer at the age of 82 . He had surgery and chemotherapy and survived another 6 years to 88. Of course, his quality of life was diminished by most standards. He willed himself to live for his wife of 63 years.
My husband’s cousin also was diagnosed with cancer. He took chemotherapy for a short time and stopped chemotherapy because of the horrific side effects. Months later his cancer was gone. It’s so unpredictable…
I believe cures are out there that do not include big Pharma expensive debilitating
drugs. We should all have choices as some cancers could be cured with less expensive and less destructive treatments .
Dr. Marik, as usual, is providing extraordinarily valuable information. The question I have is: for the (majority of) cancer types that chemotherapy is not curative against, DOES IT EVEN "extend life a month or two" as stated? Or does it even perhaps SHORTEN life in a significant fraction of cases, by predisposing the patient to life-threatening risks such as organ failure, or severe immunosuppression that could make even a mild infection deadly and could enable the remaining cancer cells to thrive and/or promote the formation of second cancers due to diminished immunosurvelliance, for example? Or simply cause horrible quality of life (not due to the cancer itself) which makes the patient more likely to "give up" sooner and agree to hospice and passive euthanasia, therefore dying sooner? I have heard multiple doctors mention these issues and I believe Dr. Marik even might have mentioned some of them himself a while back, if I remember correctly?
What I am very interested in is seeing randomized controlled clinical trials (preferably double-blinded) which show that chemotherapy either does or does not improve OVERALL SURVIVAL (even by a month or two etc.) in "incurable" cancers, compared to no chemotherapy. And if survival is indeed improved with chemotherapy in certain clinical trials of "incurable" cancers, what were the doses/regimens used in those trials, and were they much less harsh than the typical doses/regimens used in everyday patients outside of clinical trials?
My son in law is cancer free from metastatic testicular cancer for ten years. His chemotherapy nearly killed him. My mother at 79 was given 2 years to live with ovarian cancer she had chemotherapy and alternative therapies and lived for 9 years and died of heart failure.
Another question is did the patient actually have the cancer or was it a misdiagnosis to get them on the money making merry go round? My mother was told she had stomach cancer and so we got access to her notes to get a second opinion and it turned out the first doctor had "misread" her test results that stated there in black and white "Non-Malignant" but he had told her she needed him to do an operation quickly and she might live another 6 months. It turned out all she had wrong was an ulcer caused by helicobacter pylori that was cured with a cheap course of drugs over a couple of weeks. She lived for another 2 years but we are sure the shock of him telling her she had cancer when she clearly didn't shortened her life considerably.
There was a huge scandal in the British NHS a few years back where cancer tests were constantly gotten wrong on an enormous scale and the suspicion in my mind is they have simply gotten better at covering up their incompetence rather than solving the issue.
I was diagnosed with cancer in early 2020. What is clear is that the diagnosis was based on one lab report which I managed eventually to get a copy of, but not until I had 9 sessions of immunotherapy. I stopped because I worked out what was really wrong which I mention elsewhere in the comments.
NHS is hugely incompetant.
Not only incompetent but hamstrung by fears of racism. When my sister, a nurse of around 40 years standing, asked my mother's doctor why on earth he hadn't even treated my mother for the stomach bug causing the ulcer that was also in the report he received he basically said that he didn't want to tread on the consultant oncologist's toes because he was a Pakistani and so he might be accused of racism. However it was my mother's doctor who said he thought we should get a second opinion as he clearly knew she didn't have cancer but was too afraid to speak out. So we had to treat my mother ourselves and when we paid for a second set of tests with another consultant privately, we demanded a Scottish one so my mother would hopefully believe him and not the original incompetent Pakistani consultant but even after the Scottish consultant told her that she did not have cancer and that the stomach bug had been causing the issues she still believed there was no smoke without fire and that she had cancer. She was early 80's at that time and once she got a thing in her head it stayed unfortunately. The NHS is rotten to the core and those within it are too loving of their fat salaries and pensions to speak out.
Yeah and what Big Pharma company (OR participants) will agree to that? Not gonna happen
Big pharma and their cronies are very good at manipulating data. I say since when has poisoning people been any good for their health.
True, but as far as the mRNA vaccines, the RCTs done by Pfizer and Moderna DID reveal a net effect of "4 killed for every 3 saved" even under prime conditions. They weren't able to hide that (perhaps the truth is worse), but that's a start for sure.
https://www.cell.com/action/showFullTableHTML?isHtml=true&tableId=tbl1&pii=S2589-0042%2823%2900810-6
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/04/09/covid-vaccines-increase-risk-of-heart-related-deaths-by-up-to-50-lancet-analysis-of-trial-data-finds/
Yes, the thing is the 3 saved is a ridiculous statement in any event as they are trying to prove a negative. It is rather like the 20 million saved nonsense we have heard. The truth is worse, far worse.
In fact, stopping chemotherapy might give you an additional six months of high-quality life. This is just one benefit of avoiding overtreatment. With the right treatments, cancer patients don't need to resort to euthanasia.
I don't like double-blind experiments; a new drug might be compared to a medication that shortens survival time.
A friend of mine who was being treated for cancer was told by his cancer doctor to take the covid DeathVax.
He now has 2 more different cancers.
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/fenbendazole-and-cancer-at-least-d44?publication_id=400535&post_id=144518545&isFreemail=true&r=j5qou&triedRedirect=true
He won't listen. Told him not to take the 1st shot.
Thanks for posting the link for other folks.
He must have a death wish.
He trusts his doctors.
"He trusts his doctor" - unfortunately, like so many others.
It is heartbreaking to hear and watch people do it.
You are right. A friend of mine has cancer and I passed him that or a similar link a few months back but he said he would prefer to leave the treatment to his doctors, i.e. the ones that had pushed him to get the DeathVax.
Very sad... and they tell them NOTHING at all about their own immune system and how to help with diet. Evil
Absolutely!!! A close family member did choose the “expert doc” chemo/radiation path. BUT his wife kicked in w/ Dr. Marik & his Cancer Care book & expertise. Together they changed their diets (no cancer fueled foods, only cancer fighting foods). Plus Ivermectin.
Today cancer free. Healthier than ever. He lost needed weight & put away his CPAP. & most prescriptions (down to 1 statin from 2) no longer needed thanks to healthy weight loss. Says he feels better than has in 20 years! More energy.
Just cleared by colonoscopy (done by a new GI doc). Biopsy of former tumor area clear of any cancer as well as pre-cancerous cells.
He was previously told by oncologist plus previous GI doc he should follow the “standard protocol” of surgery on thar same now clear area .. just to make sure all leftover cancer cells are removed.
Standard protocol is a $$$ racket.
It's very sad to watch a patient get a DX of cancer and the emotions and IMMEDIATELY the Oncologist (well even before appt) has all the chemo and appts set up and inundate them with information when they are in no way ready to accept anything.
I figure he got at least 2 covid shots. Not sure about how many boosters.
Why? https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/vaccines-are-population-control
Not surprising, but so sad. The good news is I believe we’re going to a better place when we leave this earth plane so please be sure your friend sees this amazing uplifting story:
https://youtu.be/CmrWT6D8oNk?si=3KIGjVsT45MkwvHT
That’s a cop out that they want us to adopt.
They are MURDERING us!
Well yes... but it's for the greater good... https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/vaccines-are-population-control
They'll have to catch me first!
You obviously missed her point.
The better place is right back here so we had better work to get it fixed.
She's entitled to her belief (which I share).
A friend of mine took the Rat Juice and ended up with turbo cancer... prior to starting chemo he was given another shot ... (seems that is standard procedure)... heart attack.
Still is not connecting the cancer or heart attack to the shots even though he is extremely healthy and the doctors found no blockages or other heart disease...
This proves this https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/the-dumbest-species-ever
I don't understand their behavior.
🎯
I am one of 7 women in my family diagnosed with breast cancer over the past 20 years. My mother passed away within less than a year of her diagnosis in September 2003. She opted to allow the cancer to run its course. My sister who was diagnosed in the same month as my mother remains disabled to this day, 20 years later as a result of her chemo/radiation therapy.
Nine years later, in November 2012, my younger sister and I were diagnosed in the same month. We found out after she passed that her employer coerced her into doing the conventional therapy by withholding disability income if she didn't do chemo/radiation. Meanwhile, after doing extensive research, I chose alternative therapies because I didn't want to become disabled like my older sister. Then, 2 years later, my younger sister and I were both diagnosed again with the same coercion imposed on my younger sister. She passed less than a year later while I am healthy, strong and rarely ill.
Today, I still feel a sense of intense rage at the cancer industry and the people who insist that there is only one path to healing. My younger sister, I believe, would still be here had she done the same therapy as I did. Our diagnosis was the same and she was even healthier than I was at the time.
I share my story because I believe my sister's death should mean something. I believe that the entire pharma-medical industrial complex is complicit in murder and sharing my story might make people think twice about conventional cancer treatment. I believe that our bodies are incredibly resilient and despite all the toxins in the air food and water we have a miraculous ability to heal - as long as we're not adding to the environmental toxins by injecting carcinogenic substances directly into our bodies in the guise of treating cancer. It never made sense to me that chemo AND radiation, both known carcinogens, could ever do more than weaken the body even IF it kills cancer cells. There are SO MANY other PROVEN healing modalities. I am a living example of this.
So in summary, vaccinations, cancer treatments and many other fraudulent medical interventions are nothing but a form of theft - of our health, our money, our bodily autonomy, our genetic code. Anything we can do to expose these industries and the harms they do, the better. It's like dealing with religious zealots trying to show people evidence, facts and just common sense to state our case. Too many people are dying and suffering needlessly - all for profit. It's diabolical and it must stop.
I'm so sorry to hear how breast cancer has affected so many in your family. I too have a deep anger for the many lies still being pushed today from our mainstream physicians, especially when it comes to treating cancer. I stumbled across this substack a couple years ago and was instantly fascinated. Apparently, there is considerable evidence that many cancers respond very well to Fenbendazole, an animal anti-parasitic drug, and also Ivermectin and Doxycycline. Scroll down to read the many articles and case studies.
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/archive
Thank you. I am taking FenBen as a therapeutic as well as MMS and ivermectin. Though I do believe that nutrition, sleep, exercise, meditation, alkaline water, detoxing all play an important part in healing. A supportive community is essential. There are many websites but this program comes closest to my healing process. https://www.chrisbeatcancer.com/healing-cancer-with-the-earth-diet/. Another favourite is https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/
This story made me cry with joy, but also grief because this treatment, easily available, could have saved my sister: Miracle Stories - Kate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8cxxoJoNck
So much greed and so much evil.
Thank you for sharing your story, and very sorry to hear about all that has happened to your sisters and your mother (and you as well, but happy to hear you're "healthy, strong and rarely ill" and hope you stay that way!). The experiences of your family seem like a real example of how while chemotherapy MAY work in certain cases but that's not proven (and it's often at tremendous cost but admittedly better than dying, though there are usually viable alternatives), it almost definitely shortens life and ultimately causes death in other cases (which are probably MORE common), so the risk-benefit assessment very likely leans negative for the vast majority of patients.
Thanks for sharing your story. I’m so sorry for your losses from breast cancer and admire your courage in pushing back.
I’m recently diagnosed and am pushing back. Haven’t started chemo yet and am applying all the principles in Dr. Marin’s Cancer Care book. What was your alternative treatment- if I may ask?
Let me be clear, I am very confident that today, breast cancer can be cured. The following information might be useful to you:
Xuewu Liu
Xuewu Liu’s Substack
Jun 30
Liked by Robert Yoho MD (ret)
Today, we received news of the world's first case of intratumoral injection of chlorine dioxide for breast cancer treatment. On May 5th, a British breast cancer patient, under my guidance, underwent an intratumoral injection for her breast cancer. At that time, she described her tumor as being 7x6 cm in size, with two lymph node metastases. I recommended injecting high-concentration chlorine dioxide (above 3000 ppm) at 10% of the tumor volume. She reported injecting 6 ml into the primary tumor and 1 ml into the metastatic sites, but due to unbearable pain, she couldn't reach the suggested amount.
By early June, she noted that the tumor had softened and reduced in size. Today, she informed me that the tumor now measures 5x4 cm. I estimate that the tumor has shrunk by about 70%. Any clinician with experience in clinical trials would find this reduction ratio astonishing.
However, the patient also conveyed some disappointing news. She believes that the intratumoral chlorine dioxide injection on May 5th had no effect. According to her, the tumor reduction was due to her oral and enema use of MMS since February. To illustrate that my intratumoral injection therapy was ineffective, she claimed that the tumor size was 7x6 cm in February and has been shrinking ever since.
Reporting this case today, I want to emphasize that regardless of the method (MMS or intratumoral chlorine dioxide injection), this case demonstrates that using chlorine dioxide resulted in a 70% reduction in a breast cancer tumor within two months (which I can confirm). This is a remarkable outcome.
Well, they won’t be honest…my sister has just recently been to MDAnderson in Houston and they are pushing the chemo before surgery to “see if it shrinks the tumor so they will know if it is working or not”. If surgery before, and tumor gone, well they will never know…so if it doesn’t work before, her quality of life is horrible while they are “testing it out”, guinea pigs we all are, and they are making millions distributing these drugs. Ever watched the series on Netflix The Resident?????? Says it right out loud 💰💰💰
You read my mind, my husband and I are watching that series as we speak. Brutal and oh, so revealing.
Everyone I know who has gone the chemo route has suffered immensely and then died within a year.
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/subscriber-success-stories-stage?publication_id=400535&post_id=143048000&isFreemail=true&r=j5qou&triedRedirect=true
Decades upon decades of research, and how many BILLIONS spent, and this is all they’ve been able to do? I don’t think so. Do they really want to “cure” cancer? I don’t think so. I’ll be going the alternative medicine route if I get cancer. Lots of info being made available these days for alternative treatments. Ask Joe Tippons!
He avoided listing proper fasting. It should be added.
and to stop eating sugar!! It feeds cancer.
Absolutely!! Especially longer fasts, which promote autophagy.
Thank you for recognizing the omission. It really is important.
Understand that the chemotherapy industry has created huge revenues for Big Pharma, doctors and hospitals. There have been alternative treatments as far back as the 1930's that have been snuffed out by the FDA and the Big Pharma model. The most successful have been the use of frequencies to break up tumors and kill cancer cells, leaving healthy cells to thrive. Case in point was the frequency machine developed by Royal Raymond Rife in the late 20's and early 30's. Goggle will tell you he was a fraud, but then google is funded by those that would suffer most if this treatment became available today. However, it is my opinion that new technologies are just around the corner and we will look back in as little as 5 years and describe the current cancer protocol as barbaric. There are other treatments that are also available such as immune stimulants, detoxing, the use of B17, diet, and antihelminthic agents that kill parasites.
After looking (on three occasions over the years in the hopes of making modern high quality reproductions) at the technology Rife had available and the records of his apparatus I am convinced that he was providing UVB treatment to his patients with the radiating tube connected to his machine. There is at least one video on YT of researchers making a modern resonator on the principles Rife described and it is kind of trivial these days but still impossible to determine what his guide numbers relate to and no one has replicated his findings.
All you need is a sine wave and a square wave frequency generator (SDR units are suitable), a wide band mixer, a high power class-A RF amplifier with matching unit and an evacuated discharge tube similar to old x-ray tubes. All you get in the end is UV light that creates Vitamin-D3 in your skin.
I am a firm believer in the value of Vitamin-D3 for supporting our own immune system to fight off almost all the diseases that we meet if we are otherwise well fed and healthy.
For those who are badly deficient in Vitamin-D3 (many in western cultures and high latitudes) even modest doses from UVB, sun, diet or supplemental Vitamin-D3 can have a marked beneficial effect. Even against many (but not all) cancers.
I suggest any who are interested look up
https://vitamindwiki.com/Proof+that+Vitamin+D+Works
Thanks for your input. I would be curious to hear your evaluation on the Spooky2 device. https://www.spooky2.com/
I believe that there is technology already developed that will mimic and surpass the older Rife technology. You may find Dinshah Ghadiali's work with light frequencies interesting also.
They sell a signal generator for US$100. I am not impressed though that is in essence how a modern day Rife resonator would be implemented because the frequency generation can be done with DSP or other electronics quite trivially to achieve what the original Rife exciter blocks achieved.
The problem is that the generator is a low power transmitter that is supposed to work from low to high frequencies and do magic. I have a HP 33120A waveform generator that can probably do more than a Rife generator could do back in the day and with some software could probably surpass a Spooky2 device except for driving the plasma globe. Yet it is not possible to do anything medically useful with it because there are no tested frequencies that do anything.
On the link you sent me there is an extract (below) from a document they offer in exchange for an email (I will not take yup that offer) and the content looks like what I first saw photocopied 20 years ago, a dogs breakfast with the people creating these document having no idea what they are doing or how these numbers were created. Rire had two arbitrary scales for his two oscillators and the modulation product of the sine wave 'carrier' frequency and the square wave 'comb' signal and with the quality of equipment in the day and his total lack of decent test instruments the numbers mean ZIP, NADA, NOTHING and converting them to a single (or in many cases a few) frequencies is essentially fraud because Rife never documented which of the 'comb' harmonic peaks was the valid frequency, partly because he had no way to test and as far as the plasma lamp they were all the same and generated some ultraviolet light if there was a bit of mercury vapour in the lamp.
I would love it is there was some technological way to test or diagnose or even treat people but it mostly eludes us. I hope it will be found but at the moment believe that the placebo or healer effects are responsible for any positive results. My mother had a couple of sessions with a SCIO system and it was kind of revealing but I am not sold on that technology either.
https://www.spooky2-mall.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Rife-Book.png
It seems unlikely that Rife was a fraud, much more likely misguided and he did develop interesting though sometime impossible microscope concepts. Some of these concepts may have misled him in his resonator quest. Some of his microscopes were said to have quartz optics that would allow ultraviolet light to pass, this would have killed the organism if he used the plasma lamps to illuminate his bacteriums. The claims that he imaged viruses are not verifiable though he may have thought he did.
What is an interesting data point is the timing.
"German pediatrician Kurt Huldschinsky successfully demonstrated in the winter of 1918–1919 how rickets could be treated with ultraviolet lamps"
Rife made his resonator claims in 1931-1938 and could have been intuitive enough to think that the plasma lamp could heal people and the frequency selection was simply theatre. I hope not, I like to think well of him but it could have been.
I hope you have not spent money on a Rife resonator and rather budget for 100-500ug=4000-20'000IU of Vitamin-D3 daily with generous magnesium supplementation. Price online and in many western countries is as low as US$0.05 per 100ug=4000IU so starting under US$20 per year.
You can see extracts from my selection of published research at the link below.
https://cholecalciferol.miraheze.org/wiki/DOI
Radiation/chemotherapy kills.
You're welcome.
Mammograms too. Did you see where Switzerland has outlawed these? The procedure itself is cancer producing from the radiation. Shun mammograms!
I think most doctors will lie when asked this question “Will chemo cure or palliate my chances?” … driven by your fear and their own desire to cure, they will respond something like “of course we cannot guarantee results but there have been successes with chemo and this type of cancer and it represents our very best chance to inhibit its growth and increase your lifespan and blah blah blah” … the truth is most patients do not have the mental or emotional fortitude to turn down any treatment in that situation. Only very solid faith in God could empower the individual and doctor to be truthful and sharp in such an emotional environment.
Everything you said is true, but how many of those rare successes were DUE TO the chemo? Only a randomized controlled trial can tell. Not every single patient with "terminal" cancer dies (even though most do), and that is true regardless of whether they receive chemo or refuse chemo.
Oh possibly none but these doctors live in an alternate reality where they are valiantly fighting an enemy with the most powerful tool in their toolbox … they see every success as a result of their deployment of tools. Modern medicine is like that proverb … when all you have is a hammer, everything looos like a nail. They do not recognize the profiting they themselves are gaining by using that bluntest of instruments for every case possible. When I was growing up, we had a large piece of property and my dad bought a back hoe … you would not believe the wide array of problems that can be addressed by digging holes or tipping down small trees or other backhoe jobs. I think of doctors as my dad armed with a backhoe … very heavy handed and not a lot of careful thinking before hand
Agree, very well said
Cancer is a very lucrative business, unfortunately. I’m convinced there is a cure but Big Pharma will do everything in their power to keep it hidden.
There is a drug called "Ukrain" that seems to work pretty good. Wikipedia said the American Cancer Society said there was no evidence the drug was effective.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8899340/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8899345/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1305049/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8899349/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1305046/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8899342/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8899338/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8899346/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8899341/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11345033/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12111260/
Great find- the pancreatic cancer RCT from 2002 (last link) is quite impressive, and looks likely legit. Do you know if there have been any subsequent clinical studies since 2002? If not, wonder why when those results were that impressive. Edit: In a quick search I did find this non-clinical (cell line) study from 2021, which is definitely a good sign that there's ongoing interest, but more clinical studies would really be useful.
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjb-2021-0271/html
Sadly, I JUST had a very young neighbor (50s) die of pancreatic cancer weeks ago.
"Inositol hexaphosphate (IP6) also called phytic acid is a polyphosphorylated carbohydrate naturally found in cereals, nuts, grains, and high-fiber-containing foods. It has been shown to inhibit the growth of many different tumor cell lines both in vitro and in vivo like colon, PANCREAS, liver, prostate, and even melanoma."
"We present a case report of a patient with metastatic melanoma who declined traditional therapy and opted to try over the counter supplement IP6+inositol instead. To our surprise, the patient achieved a complete remission and remains in remission 3 years later."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30615010/
"Inositol Hexaphosphate (IP6) and Colon Cancer: From Concepts and First Experiments to Clinical Application" - 2020
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33333775/
High dose fentantyl cures cancer too
A few years ago now someone did a poll of a few thousand oncologists asking them if they would have chemotherapy if they got cancer and around 70% said no they wouldn't which then begs the question why then would they do to someone else what they would never have done to themselves? $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Any link to this poll?
I can't find a link to the poll I saw as it was in a newspaper report back in the 80's or 90's pre-internet and filed away in my head.
https://www.sott.net/article/261281-75-of-physicians-in-the-world-refuse-chemotherapy-for-themselves Based on this link the McGill Cancer Centre was one of the first to do such a poll back in the 1980's but only of 118 oncologists. The links to such polls that I found referenced on line no longer work.
Oncologists worldwide follow the NCCN guidelines from the United States to treat their patients. This standardized approach makes ordinary doctors act like veterinarians, indifferent to the effects of guideline therapies like chemotherapy on patients, especially the long-term side effects. Imagine, which doctor cares about their patient's well-being a year later? In cancer treatment, many methods like chemotherapy are prevalent, even though they are almost ineffective. Suffering patients bear the pain alone, while the doctors treating them earn high incomes without contributing any creativity.
Poisoning someone to get them to a state of health makes zero sense. I watched someone I care about suffer greatly during a course of aggressive chemotherapy treatment that ended up killing them within about two weeks after the aggressive therapy had started. They dealt with horrible sores in their mouth and zero immune system when they died. Because of a suggestion from a doctor in a well-known cancer center that they had been waiting for an appointment for. They were stable until that point, getting ready for Christmas and functioning well.
Incredibly sad, and what makes it even worse is that this is not uncommon
A report on the effectiveness of chemo / radiotherapy by the 3 largest hospital in western Sydney concluded that the success rate was 3%... gobsmacked. I have the report on a hard drive somewhere.
And this is the go-to for all cancer??
Health care is death care.
I should add chemo to the list https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/vaccines-are-population-control
Its where it belongs
The truth, often it hurts, but it is still the truth.
My dad was diagnosed with colon cancer at age 41 in 1963- likely from a year of fallout in Japan at the end of WW2 when he was 24 yo.
In 1963 he had surgery at a military hospital to remove the cancer and was then retired him from the military that year.
The prognosis was "recurrence".
TG he didn't get chemotherapy if they even had it then.
He did have recurrence and a colostomy about 1972. Did fine.
He had another recurrence about 1978 and an ileostomy- did fine.
He lived a full and active life despite the ostomies- fishing, boating, camping.
He died at age 84 of a heart arrhythmia.
I doubt he would have lived that long if he had had chemotherapy
I guess there are many stories out there and many different experiences. I was rather shocked that my brother-in-law was diagnosed with colon cancer at the age of 82 . He had surgery and chemotherapy and survived another 6 years to 88. Of course, his quality of life was diminished by most standards. He willed himself to live for his wife of 63 years.
My husband’s cousin also was diagnosed with cancer. He took chemotherapy for a short time and stopped chemotherapy because of the horrific side effects. Months later his cancer was gone. It’s so unpredictable…
I believe cures are out there that do not include big Pharma expensive debilitating
drugs. We should all have choices as some cancers could be cured with less expensive and less destructive treatments .
Cures have been there for ever but they are not profiable for big pharma. The cures include good food, clean water, good sunshine and clean air.