They knew.

Expand full comment

What about miscarriage & stillbirths?

Expand full comment

My Cousin Vinny - Let me see, get Covid or take an experimental shot that maybe permanently damages you and if it does, you have no way to sue for damages…….Um, I think I’ll go with GETTING COVID.

Expand full comment

EVERY VACCINE CAUSES HARM....period...all you need to hear and Know!!

Expand full comment

"Today's Conspiracies, may well be Tomorrows Truths"....

Expand full comment

In the Pfizer and Moderna gold-standard randomized clinical trials, excess cardiovascular deaths with vaccination canceled out the COVID death reduction, even at the height of the pandemic and at peak effectiveness. These gold-standard clinical trials are the ONLY studies equipped to directly examine the causal effects of mRNA vaccination, and they are the ONLY truly unbiased evidence on the mortality effects of mRNA vaccination, but because the clinical trial mortality results are unfavorable we never hear about them.

COVID deaths: 2 vaccine vs. 5 placebo (-60%)

non-COVID deaths: 29 vaccine vs. 25 placebo (+16%)

cardiovascular-related deaths: 16 vaccine vs. 11 placebo (+45%)

Overall: 4 excess non-COVID deaths for every 3 less COVID deaths (4 KILLED FOR EVERY 3 SAVED)



And in these clinical trials, almost all excess deaths in the vaccine groups were DELAYED by least a few months. Within the first month things looked "fine" in the trials, with almost no excess vaccine-related deaths. But by 6 months, the Pfizer and Moderna trials BOTH had 40-50% excess cardiovascular deaths and 15-17% excess non-COVID deaths overall with vaccination compared to placebo.

Expand full comment

The study funded by the same bodies that created the problem. And only looked at the list of approved adverse events. Just like how past conspiracies became acceptable, the list of accepted adverse events is only going to grow.

Expand full comment

My question. On other sm sites, I run into those who love vax, say it's safe etc, non vaxxed at great danger. Why hasn't truth seeped thru?

Why aren't vaxxed extremely alarmed?

Expand full comment

My man! Conspiracy Theorists were right back then. Check out what conspiracy theorists are now saying about the virus itself: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-it-does-matter

Expand full comment

So, Mass Murder. Known. Distributed. And if "anybody" says what we really want, VENGEANCE IS AS GOOD AS JUSTICE. Name NAMES. Do Lists. The Purge Cometh. Politicians. Doctors. Bureaucrats. BigSick Board Members. Major Stockholders... WE want your heads. 😑

Expand full comment

Now we're finding out that the vaccines are bad? The "authorities" have known this all along.

There were NIH documents dated April, 2019 which outlined the dangers of mRNA tech. The problem wasn't the delivery method, it was mRNA itself.

I link to the document here:


Expand full comment

They knew, yes. Those of us with eyes wide open saw the risks very quickly. We were attacked, marginalized and censored. If we knew the risks early from the outside, they definitely knew the risks from the inside.

Expand full comment

My insurance company called me, wanted to help me get scheduled for flu shot!!!!!! Wthell

Expand full comment

Fox and all,

Can we FINALLY focus on SOLUTIONS for America’s shameful condition???

Where do all SOLUTIONS begin?

NOTHING else matters in America in 2024 unless SOLUTIONS start here…

1. STOPPING THE VACCINES…This issue MUST be solved at 50 state level with doctors and scientists UNITING with Janci Lindsay, PhD, all working together with strategic planners!


For only Patriotic Lions who understand how important it is to do something at this critical time in America…



No 2024 ELECTION INTEGRITY = No More America!

P.S. Are you part of the doable SOLUTIONS or part of America’s problems?

Expand full comment

Just wait long enough...

Expand full comment

As a doctor when I explain risk to patients I point out to them that the % risk is the risk of getting the problem NOT the risk of how severe the problem will be.

A 1% risk means that 1 in 100 will have the problem NOT that the problem will be 1% in severity.

If there is a 1% risk of a transient skin rash you may be willing to take it.

But IF THE RISK FOR DEATH IS 1% AND YOU ARE THE 1 IN 100 WHO GETS IT - YOU WILL BE 100% DEAD NOT 1% DEAD. Likewise in this scenario if the risk of Guillian Barre is 1% and you get it you will be 100% paralyzed etc., etc. for all listed risks.


Expand full comment