Just wondering: Do others agree with the following comment made by Dr. Bliss?
As a mother of 2 myself, I don't mean at all to be harsh, cruel or uncaring ~ but wouldn't mothers (not to mention their future children) in any OB/GYN practice benefit immensely if they knew the jab could have been a contributing factor in their miscarriages?
Just wondering: Do others agree with the following comment made by Dr. Bliss?
As a mother of 2 myself, I don't mean at all to be harsh, cruel or uncaring ~ but wouldn't mothers (not to mention their future children) in any OB/GYN practice benefit immensely if they knew the jab could have been a contributing factor in their miscarriages?
In fact, if we do not provide mothers with an opportunity to learn about the possible connection between the jabs and miscarriages, are we not complicit in perpetuating the deception that the jabs have been "safe", not to mention perpetuating the ongoing harm to the unborn children?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Biss detailed that if a woman miscarries and you ask them, “Well, did you get an injection?” you may come across as accusatory to that person. “You don’t want to ever make a woman feel like she caused her baby to not be born,” Dr. Biss commented. “So it’s hard to get the exact data in all those patients.”
The question could easily be put on the questionaire when a new patient arrives in the office. Did you get child hood vaccinations? Please list. Did you get the covid shot? Please list the shot the date and manufacturer if you know it. No need to ask the person directly.
Also if someone miscarries and they start to ask why did I lose my baby. They just matter of factly can say we have notice that miscarriage rates have risen among the covid vaccinated and let it be at that. The Mother knows. She can now move on with more knowledge and have to work it out in their own head what happened and why. In the end the doctor is obligated to answer questions directly with truthful answers. Bring back informed consent.
There was a very emotional episode from Call The Midwife.. Thalidomide was identified & a knowledged to all Moms who gave births to children without limbs. If it wasn’t for Doctor Turner’s honesty & acceptance of guilt, it would have hurt mothers more. I sincerely appreciated the tough topics this series has always dealt with... 😔🙏
A big issue is whether health care providers have the time or ability to offer enough information. At least hitting the highlights truthfully would be good.
Transparency and the facts can be offered, but not fully appreciated. The info is like the book-sized legal waivers that we sign in order to use software or get employed, or take out a loan.
A lot of people don't remember all their jabs, and certainly can't list them. The CDC recommended to jab babies at 2 and 4 months to prevent 7 different disease states, with products containing a multiplicity of antigens. (There's probably another one being added to that.) It's a busy time for a person with an immature immune system. One wonders if letting the gut handle some of the antigens first would not be wiser.
There are so many immunization options, it should be a medical specialty. Most of those who are ordering and administering the various jabs can't tell you how they work or what's in them.
Parts of patient jab histories are in the electronic record, and some states keep a database.
Usually they just ask if you think you are "up to date" on your vaccines?
In the end I think it is better to build up your T-cells so your resist all sickness than worry about taking any shot with an adjuvant in it to increase antigens for a specific illness for a period of time as the toxins in the adjuant can indeed build up in the body and later cause harm to people.
Seeing how often the CDC changes recommendations, and how many there are, it’s hard to expect a patient to know. Each state has it’s own interpretation of ‘up to date’.
I guess over all I believe these shots are a bunch of garbage anyway. Allopathic Medical Mafia Rockerfeller trained doctors refuse to ask for long term double blind studies on shots to know the real truth. So as long as we are pretending the shots are safe with their added adjuvants in it, then I can just make up any answer too. Nothing really matters in make believe land.
I would say that adulterants, rather than adjuvants are the biggest, new problem.
A significant, ongoing issue is that of stable DNA adulterants (with tumor promoting sequences or effects) being incorporated in the genome and passed on.
Our leaders are making decisions based on a TV quality understanding of biochemistry and genetics. And there's an astonishing amount of grift involved.
I hope to have as little association with corruptocrats as possible, and instead wish to promote good nutrition, and healthy lifestyle.
[“You don’t want to ever make a woman feel like she caused her baby to not be born,” Dr. Biss commented. “So it’s hard to get the exact data in all those patients.”]
This is not the first time that patients have been harmed by sparing their feelings. It still goes on with respect to any so-called, stigmatized disease process, as well as medically mis-dosing, mal-treating, or altering those who want to be treated as the opposite sex.
All you have to do is ask those mothers who took that wonder drug for morning sickness (thalidomide) to get an answer. Medico's you need to be honest full stop! No excuses. Not ever.
I went to primary school with a girl who is no longer alive, whose mother committed suicide when she was a toddler. (Fortunately for me, my mother never got morning sickness and neither did I with any of my pregnancies.) I remember, in kindergarten and primary school classes this girl had a wonky walk with awkward hand movements, with a handkerchief permanently pinned to the left side of her dress/top as she dribbled non-stop. Her father tried to run a business and raised her alone. He never remarried. I was quite sad to learn he died in Melbourne during 2021.
Medico's just tell the plain simple truth and stop this nonsense of worrying about feelings. That is just woke b*s. Be honest. Be truthful.
As someone who had a stillbirth, yes, they need to be informed but there is a time and a place and it is NOT immediately after the event. I would want the doctor to gently introduce the topic at the follow up visit. For one thing, miscarriages do happen and so not all of these are caused by the jab. And remember, the woman cannot be UNjabbed. She needs to know what is known which is that the jab may have played a role. She also needs to know what to do next. This is a woman who wants a baby in most cases. Freaking her out in a highly vulnerable state is not doing anyone any good.
You have two children but have you had a miscarriage or a stillbirth?
Right after the event is NOT the time to punch her in the face with the consequences of an action that was recommended to her. I do agree she should be informed but care must be taken. She is vulnerable and may be in or go into depression of a serious nature. She also needs to be given some of kind recourse - actions she can take to help her body recover as she cannot be UNjabbed.
Just wondering: Do others agree with the following comment made by Dr. Bliss?
As a mother of 2 myself, I don't mean at all to be harsh, cruel or uncaring ~ but wouldn't mothers (not to mention their future children) in any OB/GYN practice benefit immensely if they knew the jab could have been a contributing factor in their miscarriages?
In fact, if we do not provide mothers with an opportunity to learn about the possible connection between the jabs and miscarriages, are we not complicit in perpetuating the deception that the jabs have been "safe", not to mention perpetuating the ongoing harm to the unborn children?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Biss detailed that if a woman miscarries and you ask them, “Well, did you get an injection?” you may come across as accusatory to that person. “You don’t want to ever make a woman feel like she caused her baby to not be born,” Dr. Biss commented. “So it’s hard to get the exact data in all those patients.”
The question could easily be put on the questionaire when a new patient arrives in the office. Did you get child hood vaccinations? Please list. Did you get the covid shot? Please list the shot the date and manufacturer if you know it. No need to ask the person directly.
Also if someone miscarries and they start to ask why did I lose my baby. They just matter of factly can say we have notice that miscarriage rates have risen among the covid vaccinated and let it be at that. The Mother knows. She can now move on with more knowledge and have to work it out in their own head what happened and why. In the end the doctor is obligated to answer questions directly with truthful answers. Bring back informed consent.
There was a very emotional episode from Call The Midwife.. Thalidomide was identified & a knowledged to all Moms who gave births to children without limbs. If it wasn’t for Doctor Turner’s honesty & acceptance of guilt, it would have hurt mothers more. I sincerely appreciated the tough topics this series has always dealt with... 😔🙏
I did enjoy that show too.
A big issue is whether health care providers have the time or ability to offer enough information. At least hitting the highlights truthfully would be good.
Transparency and the facts can be offered, but not fully appreciated. The info is like the book-sized legal waivers that we sign in order to use software or get employed, or take out a loan.
A lot of people don't remember all their jabs, and certainly can't list them. The CDC recommended to jab babies at 2 and 4 months to prevent 7 different disease states, with products containing a multiplicity of antigens. (There's probably another one being added to that.) It's a busy time for a person with an immature immune system. One wonders if letting the gut handle some of the antigens first would not be wiser.
There are so many immunization options, it should be a medical specialty. Most of those who are ordering and administering the various jabs can't tell you how they work or what's in them.
Parts of patient jab histories are in the electronic record, and some states keep a database.
Usually they just ask if you think you are "up to date" on your vaccines?
In the end I think it is better to build up your T-cells so your resist all sickness than worry about taking any shot with an adjuvant in it to increase antigens for a specific illness for a period of time as the toxins in the adjuant can indeed build up in the body and later cause harm to people.
Seeing how often the CDC changes recommendations, and how many there are, it’s hard to expect a patient to know. Each state has it’s own interpretation of ‘up to date’.
I guess over all I believe these shots are a bunch of garbage anyway. Allopathic Medical Mafia Rockerfeller trained doctors refuse to ask for long term double blind studies on shots to know the real truth. So as long as we are pretending the shots are safe with their added adjuvants in it, then I can just make up any answer too. Nothing really matters in make believe land.
I would say that adulterants, rather than adjuvants are the biggest, new problem.
A significant, ongoing issue is that of stable DNA adulterants (with tumor promoting sequences or effects) being incorporated in the genome and passed on.
Our leaders are making decisions based on a TV quality understanding of biochemistry and genetics. And there's an astonishing amount of grift involved.
I hope to have as little association with corruptocrats as possible, and instead wish to promote good nutrition, and healthy lifestyle.
Watching out for patients' feelings is further denying them the right of informed consent, or ability to prevent further adverse reactions.
I think she is saying that if the mother feels as though she is being accused they won't be truthful or forthcoming.
I'm sort of taking her at her word:
[“You don’t want to ever make a woman feel like she caused her baby to not be born,” Dr. Biss commented. “So it’s hard to get the exact data in all those patients.”]
This is not the first time that patients have been harmed by sparing their feelings. It still goes on with respect to any so-called, stigmatized disease process, as well as medically mis-dosing, mal-treating, or altering those who want to be treated as the opposite sex.
All you have to do is ask those mothers who took that wonder drug for morning sickness (thalidomide) to get an answer. Medico's you need to be honest full stop! No excuses. Not ever.
I went to primary school with a girl who is no longer alive, whose mother committed suicide when she was a toddler. (Fortunately for me, my mother never got morning sickness and neither did I with any of my pregnancies.) I remember, in kindergarten and primary school classes this girl had a wonky walk with awkward hand movements, with a handkerchief permanently pinned to the left side of her dress/top as she dribbled non-stop. Her father tried to run a business and raised her alone. He never remarried. I was quite sad to learn he died in Melbourne during 2021.
Medico's just tell the plain simple truth and stop this nonsense of worrying about feelings. That is just woke b*s. Be honest. Be truthful.
The truth can be delivered without drilling the patient into the ground, (particularly for that which largely due to coercion, such as jab mandates.)
But there’s a chance a life saving lesson could be learned for the Mom..
As someone who had a stillbirth, yes, they need to be informed but there is a time and a place and it is NOT immediately after the event. I would want the doctor to gently introduce the topic at the follow up visit. For one thing, miscarriages do happen and so not all of these are caused by the jab. And remember, the woman cannot be UNjabbed. She needs to know what is known which is that the jab may have played a role. She also needs to know what to do next. This is a woman who wants a baby in most cases. Freaking her out in a highly vulnerable state is not doing anyone any good.
I agree that is optimal in the cases where a follow up visit is likely. The manner of questioning and delivery of information can help.
Delivering lifesaving info is uppermost, and it appears that some regimens to mitigate certain jab effects are being studied and applied.
My suggestion is to get off the COVID jab train, because the benefit does not appear to outweigh the risk.
People have been very accepting of the concept that pregnant women should take as few drugs as is reasonably possible.
In the case of injections, it sure as (bleep) is!
She’s just continuing the charade, for nobody’s true benefit.
Obstetric departments are closing because of labor shortage and other issues.
Obstetrical malpractice insurance is extremely high priced.
She's certainly in danger of losing board certification by doing what she's doing.
If you were in that physician's shoes, what would you do?
What steps would you take to confer more benefit to humanity?
...for the true benefit of HER PRACTICE.
Good post!!
I do NOT agree with Dr. Bliss on this point. Asking jab status is so basic!
You have two children but have you had a miscarriage or a stillbirth?
Right after the event is NOT the time to punch her in the face with the consequences of an action that was recommended to her. I do agree she should be informed but care must be taken. She is vulnerable and may be in or go into depression of a serious nature. She also needs to be given some of kind recourse - actions she can take to help her body recover as she cannot be UNjabbed.
WORD
I know, accusatory or not, safety first, I would think.