The U.K. government is corrupt to put it mildly. As a British Citizen as well as a US citizen I am embarrassed when asked about what happened to the conservatives in Parliament. The cover up is unsurprising as there was a big cover up of deaths and serious adverse events during the Pfizer Clinical trials. The HIDDEN DEATHS we reported on in our Forensic Analysis of the Pfizer Clinical Trial published in a peer reviewed journal last November and missing/deleted patients/trial-subjects showed the reason that we need FULL TRANSPARENCY immediately.
he's a PhD in nursing...I already knew that...I realize some people don't refer to PhD's as doctors. Some definitely do so. Either Professor or Doctor are considered acceptable for PhD's. Why the anger? ...if you don't like the guy. Move on.
Love Dr. Campbell...Here's the kicker...The UK has actually been more transparent than the USA throughout Covid. We in the U.S. have no leg to stand on when criticizing other countries (per usual).
I am fully on board that govts have not been transparent and have mislead citizens with the disastrous public health protocols.
However, in 2020 I was repeatedly pointing out that we were not having as many excess deaths as they were reporting. The age standardized method creates a black box and looking at the past 5 years as a benchmark going forwards is only accurate if the distribution of your demographics remains static.
As an example look at how many deaths occurred in Canada in 2019 as a benchmark of what to expect in 2020 set you up for believing there was excess even if 50 years and 10 year old and 85 year olds all died at exactly the same rates per 100,000 as they did between 2015-2019, simply because a greater proportion of the population moved towards age cohorts with higher mortality rates. I feel govts used this to promote the idea that we were experiencing so many excess deaths in 2020 and of course they attributed it all to Covid.
The same is probably still true, we can’t be looming to the past 5 years to predict next year. And drop the age adjusted mortality rates. Calculate estimated deaths for each age cohort separately (population x mortality rate from a control period say 2015-2019) then add all of them together.
In Canada again as an example by 2030 using the mortality rates for each age cohort from 2015-2019 applied to the estimates population of each age cohort the expected number of deaths is approaching 400,000 per year while in 2019 285,000 died even though the population is only estimated to be 7% more in 2030 than in 2019.
Thing about numbers you can produce every different values using the exact same data, it’s a matter of making a model that is relevant to what is actually occurring on the ground.
It's like how they were able to push the bogus narrative that we had a "pandemic of the unvaccinated." They just didn't find out how many people had really been vaccinated. The software form had a box for "unknown." That selection then became "unvaccinated" when most of those hospital admissions would have been "vaccinated."
The U.K. government is corrupt to put it mildly. As a British Citizen as well as a US citizen I am embarrassed when asked about what happened to the conservatives in Parliament. The cover up is unsurprising as there was a big cover up of deaths and serious adverse events during the Pfizer Clinical trials. The HIDDEN DEATHS we reported on in our Forensic Analysis of the Pfizer Clinical Trial published in a peer reviewed journal last November and missing/deleted patients/trial-subjects showed the reason that we need FULL TRANSPARENCY immediately.
We’re just a number on their white board, we can be erased
Criminal but not surprising....how many bits of data got memory holed once they turned negative? All of them?
They might be able to hide the deaths but undertakers will have records of their customers. Get them together.
And the criminals are walking around free with impunity and richer …..
Now the is getting ridiculous, government statistics, lies and more lies.
Fortunately, we all know they truth by now. Thank you, Dr John Campbell, for all of your diligence in getting truth out to us.
Now, we know that they know the truth (probably always did). How are we going to squash the head of this ugly serpant?
I don't need the ONS. I don't need the CDC, FDA, etc. They lie. They butcher data.
I can SEE with my own two eyes. And what I see ain't pretty...
They can't hide it unless WE let them (by getting distracted with other much less important things).
Share this as much as you can, before more and more sources keep manipulating the data:
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-excess-deaths-per-million-covid?tab=chart&time=2020-01-25..2022-12-31&country=AUS~CAN~USA~JPN~GBR~DEU~ITA~NZL~KOR
And this also, the gold-standard of evidence from clinical trials:
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/04/09/covid-vaccines-increase-risk-of-heart-related-deaths-by-up-to-50-lancet-analysis-of-trial-data-finds/
he's a PhD in nursing...I already knew that...I realize some people don't refer to PhD's as doctors. Some definitely do so. Either Professor or Doctor are considered acceptable for PhD's. Why the anger? ...if you don't like the guy. Move on.
Love Dr. Campbell...Here's the kicker...The UK has actually been more transparent than the USA throughout Covid. We in the U.S. have no leg to stand on when criticizing other countries (per usual).
I am fully on board that govts have not been transparent and have mislead citizens with the disastrous public health protocols.
However, in 2020 I was repeatedly pointing out that we were not having as many excess deaths as they were reporting. The age standardized method creates a black box and looking at the past 5 years as a benchmark going forwards is only accurate if the distribution of your demographics remains static.
As an example look at how many deaths occurred in Canada in 2019 as a benchmark of what to expect in 2020 set you up for believing there was excess even if 50 years and 10 year old and 85 year olds all died at exactly the same rates per 100,000 as they did between 2015-2019, simply because a greater proportion of the population moved towards age cohorts with higher mortality rates. I feel govts used this to promote the idea that we were experiencing so many excess deaths in 2020 and of course they attributed it all to Covid.
The same is probably still true, we can’t be looming to the past 5 years to predict next year. And drop the age adjusted mortality rates. Calculate estimated deaths for each age cohort separately (population x mortality rate from a control period say 2015-2019) then add all of them together.
In Canada again as an example by 2030 using the mortality rates for each age cohort from 2015-2019 applied to the estimates population of each age cohort the expected number of deaths is approaching 400,000 per year while in 2019 285,000 died even though the population is only estimated to be 7% more in 2030 than in 2019.
Thing about numbers you can produce every different values using the exact same data, it’s a matter of making a model that is relevant to what is actually occurring on the ground.
It's like how they were able to push the bogus narrative that we had a "pandemic of the unvaccinated." They just didn't find out how many people had really been vaccinated. The software form had a box for "unknown." That selection then became "unvaccinated" when most of those hospital admissions would have been "vaccinated."
Sneaky, sneaky, sneaky.
Can somebody explain the difference between the old way of calculating and the new way of calculating...in plain English?
It's really interesting. Do "they" realize they are devaluing their own lives by not valuing others? It's actually sociopathic.
"you can't hide the dead bodies"
Except in New York City.. Thank you Jessica Hockett for your stamina to find out what happened in New York.